Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755019AbXKDXVZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:21:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752807AbXKDXVS (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:21:18 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:39750 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752648AbXKDXVR (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:21:17 -0500 Message-ID: <472E53D0.2000204@goop.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:20:48 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: Marco Costalba , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: duplicated include files References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 760 Lines: 18 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > actually, one wonders if there's any value in keeping any references > to other version control systems such as subversion, SCCS, CVS, > mercurial, etc. > What do you mean by "other"? git doesn't have a monopoly, and the kernel should support people using a reasonable set of version control systems. Supporting VSS would be strange, but nothing wrong with the set you listed, if people find those systems useful. It's not like it amounts to a huge amount of effort to do so. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/