Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:43:12 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
        Alan Ma <tech@biqu3d.com>,
        Luke Harrison <bttuniversity@biqu3d.com>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin@biqu3d.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: smccc: Export both soc_id functions
Message-ID: <20230830154312.zferm3it7mj4nwsy@bogus>
References: <20230830-smccc_export-v1-1-6ecc7661bc94@somainline.org>
 <CAPKp9ubXJbLQ_jOt3sp7Y8KXKyp42bzjHqbaa19LSqGMxE2yPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BSJ70S.HFFPUN9486BN2@somainline.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BSJ70S.HFFPUN9486BN2@somainline.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 04:19:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> The patches using this are still WIP but the basic point is that H616 has 2
> die revisions (And those have
> couple of other versions themselves) that require different uV and some
> frequencies are blacklisted on those
> versions.
> 
> The driver is using these functions to read the revision (Not the version.
> It just looked like the logical
> thing to export both and Andre confirmed. We can ofc drop the version symbol
> export if need be) and reads
> trough the OPP table and selects the supported frequencies and uV for the
> chip its running on :)
> 
> I will try to get the cpufreq patches in order in the upcoming days and I
> will Cc you in those as well +
> post a link to them in this thread :)
> 

For simplicity, just make this patch part of the series that adds cpufreq
support on this platform/soc. Cross referencing won't give any more confidence
that the user is also getting merged at the same time as this patch.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep