Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:29:42 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bjorn@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: provide riscv-specific is_trap_insn()
Message-ID: <20230831-untidy-geologic-8c8232eb3cac@spud>
References: <20230827205641.46836-1-namcaov@gmail.com>
 <CAJF2gTQysBBSbtFcx1uY_ztTnzN5jRWpG2OD4O3aJ0u9Ekwsag@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230829-unbridle-condense-2fc45a442bb6@wendy>
 <ZO2p1tScBT1UFMh1@nam-dell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pX1jrx4hiKgkc+Cg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZO2p1tScBT1UFMh1@nam-dell>
Precedence: bulk


--pX1jrx4hiKgkc+Cg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:18:30AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:

> Now I'm not sure what you mean. But I agree with Guo Ren here, users can use
> compressed instructions but kernel does not have it enabled. So we should
> always check c.ebreak regardless of RISCV_ISA_C.

I think I was just being dumb, apologies for the noise.

--pX1jrx4hiKgkc+Cg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZPC/9gAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0iNIAQDlFOLhVRwewDs3RynOY+M19AyVbnv6fuCWrcIVf6rtpQEAuxuaR9YxMsh/
J1iTji590xUIscZGwQx0MV/Mn6UZTgA=
=Oo6H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pX1jrx4hiKgkc+Cg--