Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To:     linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com
Cc:     James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
        John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
        Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Haixin Yu <yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
        Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
        Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
        Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] perf pmus: Simplify perf_pmus__find_core_pmu()
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:16:17 +0100
Message-Id: <20230831151632.124985-7-james.clark@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230831151632.124985-1-james.clark@arm.com>
References: <20230831151632.124985-1-james.clark@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Currently the while loop always either exits on the first iteration with
a core PMU, or exits with NULL on heterogeneous systems or when not all
CPUs are online.

Both of the latter behaviors are undesirable for platforms other than
Arm so simplify it to always return the first core PMU, or NULL if none
exist.

This behavior was depended on by the Arm version of
pmu_metrics_table__find(), so the logic has been moved there instead.

Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c |  8 +++++++-
 tools/perf/util/pmus.c           | 14 +-------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
index 3d9330feebd2..3099f5f448ba 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
@@ -10,8 +10,14 @@
 
 const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
 {
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu;
+
+	/* Metrics aren't currently supported on heterogeneous Arm systems */
+	if (perf_pmus__num_core_pmus() > 1)
+		return NULL;
 
+	/* Doesn't matter which one here because they'll all be the same */
+	pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
 	if (pmu)
 		return perf_pmu__find_metrics_table(pmu);
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
index 032ce57d2b8e..5ae41644ccda 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
@@ -596,17 +596,5 @@ struct perf_pmu *evsel__find_pmu(const struct evsel *evsel)
 
 struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__find_core_pmu(void)
 {
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
-
-	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu))) {
-		/*
-		 * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
-		 * not support some events or have different event IDs.
-		 */
-		if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
-			return NULL;
-
-		return pmu;
-	}
-	return NULL;
+	return perf_pmus__scan_core(NULL);
 }
-- 
2.34.1