Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:32:19 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc:     Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@nxp.com>,
        "atenart@kernel.org" <atenart@kernel.org>,
        "Radu-nicolae Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>,
        "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Sebastian Tobuschat <sebastian.tobuschat@nxp.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "richardcochran@gmail.com" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        "edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
        "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 5/5] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: implement
 mdo_insert_tx_tag
Message-ID: <ZPG9s1LDbphnBHUE@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20230824091615.191379-1-radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>
 <20230824091615.191379-6-radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>
 <ZOx0L722xg5-J_he@hog>
 <5d42d6c9-2f0c-8913-49ec-50a25860c49f@oss.nxp.com>
 <ZO8pbtnlOVauabjC@hog>
 <518c11e9000f895fddb5b3dc4d5b2bf445cf320f.camel@nxp.com>
 <ZPG35HfRseiv80Pb@hog>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZPG35HfRseiv80Pb@hog>
Sender: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 12:07:32PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2023-09-01, 09:09:06 +0000, Radu Pirea wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 13:35 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > ...
> > 
> > > And it's not restored when the link goes back up? That's inconvenient
> > > :/
> > > Do we end up with inconsistent state? ie driver and core believe
> > > everything is still offloaded, but HW lost all state? do we leak
> > > some resources allocated by the driver?
> > 
> > Yes. We end up with inconsistent state. The HW will lost all state when
> > the phy is reseted. No resource is leaked, everything is there, but the
> > configuration needs to be reapplied.
> > 
> > > 
> > > We could add a flush/restore in macsec_notify when the lower device
> > > goes down/up, maybe limited to devices that request this (I don't
> > > know
> > > if all devices would need it, or maybe all devices offloading to the
> > > PHY but not to the MAC).
> > 
> > Agreed.
> > We can do a flush very simple, but to restore the configuration maybe
> > we should to save the key in the macsec_key structure. I am not sure if
> > the key can be extracted from crypto_aead structure.
> 
> Either that or in the driver. I have a small preference for driver,
> because then cases that don't need this restore won't have to keep the
> key in memory, reducing the likelihood of accidentally sharing it.
> OTOH, if we centralize that code, it's easier to make sure everything
> is cleared from kernel memory when we delete the SA.

Maybe consider about doing it as a library function, so drivers that
need this don't have to reimplement the functionality in randomly
buggy ways?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!