Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:20:01 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Rajeshwar Shinde <coolrrsh@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mpc512x-psc: Fix an unsigned comparison that
 can never be negative
Message-ID: <ZPTAQWZ0XoL9zfW7@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
References: <20230813141207.150336-1-coolrrsh@gmail.com>
 <CA+VNjV1=xVyRkvB6RAnLySAOzS=X1XiJihrtiMx3Jmifpdq9ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <df10d700-3f3f-4665-9197-534abc24523a@sirena.org.uk>
 <CA+VNjV1K6WoKPqP4zrax5SOF3UFCiJ5oYA=YamjZwfZ5fkEHWg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k3VdGoWfWwkGY0zV"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+VNjV1K6WoKPqP4zrax5SOF3UFCiJ5oYA=YamjZwfZ5fkEHWg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--k3VdGoWfWwkGY0zV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:12:25PM +0530, Rajeshwar Shinde wrote:

> Remainder

Please read the mail you are replying to...

> On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 5:02 pm Mark Brown, <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:38:48AM +0530, Rajeshwar Shinde wrote:
> > > Please verify this patch.
> > > Thanks & Regards
> >
> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> > for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
> >
> > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > for the subsystem are normally handled.
> >
> > Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
> > readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> > you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> > discussion is being addressed.
> >

--k3VdGoWfWwkGY0zV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmT0wDsACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9B4Vwf+IheQSKPrAkq0gdrld/T0ObUrjfSjw5ssj6fRSnZuNB1Vdc2/4AdeTS5e
68W6QjOJJBbHNBDNSuYtOxd3fYmykEQHcES3Lqb0xITDwT1Z9Ffnt5H2kAfqBo90
Kud+cyoenb2ftSqsIr6yMb3Wi+ZDHWSkrYgPabgRKaFJySP5qka1ZKGJ4X9zaQ5Y
Dkmk3o6U3BUk/iBiKHlCrNUrWqiKygHBAiLuUzAWotC27wQhJChcnfCcu44mbIoT
8y1yx7jzpULvu8G2lV2LiGVkqzrk+AYE4+LPx2oN9Iol8Gtuc6q88eTESGvgT48v
Ogto1KLtvTrBUT6blWzfDXbSfTFZRw==
=4v21
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k3VdGoWfWwkGY0zV--