Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:16:35 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] drm/bridge: panel: Drop CONFIG_OF conditional
 around  *_of_get_bridge()
Message-ID: <ZPC84+k8aot5LyGT@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230831080938.47454-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
 <20230831080938.47454-5-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
 <20230831093108.GF2698@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
 <OS0PR01MB592262D3EDAF424252157D5B86E5A@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OS0PR01MB592262D3EDAF424252157D5B86E5A@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 10:47:24AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 09:09:38AM +0100, Biju Das wrote:

...

> > > Drop unnecessary CONFIG_OF conditional around devm_drm_of_get_bridge()
> > > and
> > > drmm_of_get_bridge() as it is guarded with #if..#else blocks in
> > > drm_bridge.h.
> > 
> > This will increase the kernel size on non-OF system, to add functions that
> > are not used. I don't think the #ifdef here is problematic.
> 
> OK agreed. I guess for NON-OF system it will give build error
> for function redefinition, if that is the case I would like to
> drop this patch.
> 
> static inline struct drm_bridge *devm_drm_of_get_bridge()
> 
> vs
> 
> struct drm_bridge *devm_drm_of_get_bridge()

Yeah, yet another argument in favour of switching to fwnode.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko