Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:41:18 +0100
Message-ID: <86ledkeqs1.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Fang Xiang <fangxiang3@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable non-coherent redistributors/ITSes probing
In-Reply-To: <ZPcfd9I4NvXceJTb@lpieralisi>
References: <20230905104721.52199-1-lpieralisi@kernel.org>
        <20230905104721.52199-3-lpieralisi@kernel.org>
        <86msy0etul.wl-maz@kernel.org>
        <ZPcfd9I4NvXceJTb@lpieralisi>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/28.2
 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:30:47 +0100,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:34:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > I came up with the following alternative approach, which is as usual
> > completely untested. It is entirely based on the quirk infrastructure,
> > and doesn't touch the ACPI path at all.
> 
> The patch below makes sense and it is much cleaner - provided we
> consider this a quirk, which I am not sure it is, that's the only
> question I have.

Come on, the whole architecture is a bag of sick hacks. And given that
it makes the change slightly less ugly, I'd rather have that.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.