Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756530AbXKFB3t (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:29:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754738AbXKFB3l (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:29:41 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:39844 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754507AbXKFB3l (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:29:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:29:16 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Roland Dreier , Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace "make ARCH=i386/x86_64 with make ARCH=x86" Message-ID: <20071106012916.GE3444@stusta.de> References: <20071103234826.GA26654@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20071105104129.GB3662@infradead.org> <20071105171740.GA29481@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20071105214937.GA31496@uranus.ravnborg.org> <472FAB4C.9040303@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <472FAB4C.9040303@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1715 Lines: 51 On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:46:20PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 01:36:42PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: >>> > Like this: >>> > $ make ARCH=foo >>> > Makefile:201: *** "ERROR: ARCH (foo) does not exist". Stop. >>> >>> Seems sane, but maybe it would be worth putting in a special case >>> check for someone using i386 or x86_64 for ARCH, and tell them to >>> switch to x86? >> >> Will do so if my patchset gets applied. Need to redo it but >> that will be later this week and then I hope for a bit more >> feedback from the x86 guys. > > The patchset has looked good to me, and I believe it would be better to > take this particular breakage sooner rather than later. > > I haven't spoken up actively mostly because I wanted to look at the user > comments as they have been coming in. > > The issue with "make allyesconfig" concerns me, although the same situation > already exists with any multiple-choice configuration. What I guess we > really want is to be able to specify a few specific choices. It's already available: $ cat myconfig CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y CONFIG_SMP=n CONFIG_PCI=n CONFIG_IPV6=m $ make allyesconfig KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=myconfig > -hpa cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/