Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:52:51 +0200
From:   Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To:     Jeremy Cline <jeremy@jcline.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        syzbot+c1d0a03d305972dbbe14@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: nfc: llcp: Add lock when modifying device list
Message-ID: <20230911125251.GA23672@kernel.org>
References: <20230908235853.1319596-1-jeremy@jcline.org>
 <20230910152812.GJ775887@kernel.org>
 <ZP5L6/zF6fE+ogbz@dev>
 <20230911055904.GN775887@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230911055904.GN775887@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:59:04AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 07:06:19PM -0400, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 05:28:12PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 07:58:53PM -0400, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > > The device list needs its associated lock held when modifying it, or the
> > > > list could become corrupted, as syzbot discovered.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c1d0a03d305972dbbe14@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c1d0a03d305972dbbe14
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@jcline.org>
> > > 
> > > Hi Jeremy,
> > > 
> > > thanks for your patch.
> > > 
> > > I don't think you need to resubmit for this,
> > > I think this patch warrants a fixes tag:
> > > 
> > > Fixes: d646960f7986 ("NFC: Initial LLCP support")
> > > 
> > 
> > My bad, indeed. The lock in question looks to have been added in
> > 6709d4b7bc2e ("net: nfc: Fix use-after-free caused by
> > nfc_llcp_find_local") which itself includes a couple fix tags, should
> > this reference that commit instead as it won't backport without that
> > one?
> 
> Yes, I think that is likely.
> Sorry for not noticing that.

And further, sorry for being vague in my previous email.
Having now looked over 6709d4b7bc2e I agree it is
the correct commit for a fixes tag for this patch.

> 
> > > Otherwise, this looks good to me.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jeremy
> > 
>