Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230901234202.566951-1-dianders@chromium.org>
 <20230901164111.RFT.5.I2b014f90afc4729b6ecc7b5ddd1f6dedcea4625b@changeid>
 <CAC=S1niYAC3PFQoAmwVc=1FcK29uu5sC9c1pGo-mku__y7eHcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD=FV=VT8ZQkcLn4nsxCygC5SG16qYW5igFfwM762jEK42p12g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VT8ZQkcLn4nsxCygC5SG16qYW5igFfwM762jEK42p12g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:28:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC=S1njNfjOaSidUHSGPKC+-625Ysx66wx9Sk02ZXGvpUKYBbA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 05/15] drm/mediatek: Call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown()
 at shutdown time
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, airlied@gmail.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, chunkuang.hu@kernel.org,
        daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        matthias.bgg@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:11=E2=80=AFAM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.o=
rg> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> That makes sense. I had based this series on drm-misc-next which
> didn't have those, but now that a new -rc1 is out it then
> drm-misc-next should rebase shortly. I'll make sure that the next
> version includes Uwe's changes as much as possible.
>
> That being said, I also wouldn't object if the maintainer of this DRM
> driver wanted to resolve conflicts themselves and land the patch
> without me needing to resend. The conflict is trivial, there are no
> dependencies and no reason to land the series all at once, so landing
> this patch early would mean less spam for the maintainer since they
> would no longer get CCed on future versions. :-P Just sayin...

Oh then feel free to ignore that if the changes weren't in the tree at
that time... It was just a gentle reminder. Thanks for clarifying.  :)

Regards,
Fei

>
> -Doug