Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 08:41:04 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        "S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, conor+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        LnxRevLi <LnxRevLi@nxp.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
        Mpuaudiosw <Mpuaudiosw@nxp.com>,
        "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP
Message-ID: <ZQB4gMyfJK9sFXID@p14s>
References: <20230911224452.15739-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
 <20230911224452.15739-3-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
 <67de5706-d966-dd71-85c3-c95bc1b72733@linaro.org>
 <c0b32f41-46b4-81ad-9718-5f0856e42cb1@nxp.com>
 <32287c0a-e3c1-e474-3c90-913fe2c79879@linaro.org>
 <fe47a94e-6788-a5ee-e8ee-ca58e4fa62d6@nxp.com>
 <af1959ce-d817-2a9e-9c28-fed8c608a3df@linaro.org>
 <dc402d33-88b1-e828-e6a5-2de060fbcdca@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dc402d33-88b1-e828-e6a5-2de060fbcdca@nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:51:42PM +0300, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
> On 9/12/2023 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
> > > > > Should I test this on other tree(s)?
> > > > You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it
> > > > on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send?
> > > > 
> > > > If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next
> > > > for this?
> > > TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked.
> > > 
> > > For sure one patch is for remoteproc.
> > > For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on
> > > linux-next, as you suggested.
> > MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically,
> > this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not
> > be together in one patchset.
> 
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> I need to send a v2 - to fix the dtsi missing bracket on patch 2.
> So, should I keep the 2 patches together or send them separately?
>

Marco is already aware of this patchset so I would keep them together.

> Thanks,
> Iulia
> 
> 
>