Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:54:37 +0200
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        matz@suse.de
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 13 (objtool)
Message-ID: <20230914135437.tmb42rqcz6dv6wjc@treble>
References: <20230913150445.49bee094@canb.auug.org.au>
 <a53f9840-8581-44cc-beaf-6fb644c8cacc@infradead.org>
 <20230913214753.3xqemkqjhxcwqaz4@treble>
 <20230914072327.GB16631@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230914072327.GB16631@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:23:27AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > We could just make smscore_load_firmware_from_file() noinline.
> > 
> > Or we could hard-code the fact that smscore_load_firmware_from_file() is
> > only called in the SMS_DEVICE_FAMILY2 case, like:
> 
> Yeah, this seems simplest. The code in question doesn't seem overly
> complicated and we can simply avoid confusing GCC.

I'm on my way out the door for vacation, if anybody wants to slap a
description on the patch and send it along, feel free :-)

-- 
Josh