Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
Reply-To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:10 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20230914015531.1419405-1-seanjc@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20230914015531.1419405-1-seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20230914015531.1419405-13-seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 12/33] mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as
 completely unmovable
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>,
        Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
        Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
        Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
        Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
        Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Add an "unmovable" flag for mappings that cannot be migrated under any
circumstance.  KVM will use the flag for its upcoming GUEST_MEMFD support,
which will not support compaction/migration, at least not in the
foreseeable future.

Test AS_UNMOVABLE under folio lock as already done for the async
compaction/dirty folio case, as the mapping can be removed by truncation
while compaction is running.  To avoid having to lock every folio with a
mapping, assume/require that unmovable mappings are also unevictable, and
have mapping_set_unmovable() also set AS_UNEVICTABLE.

Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 include/linux/pagemap.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++-
 mm/compaction.c         | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 mm/migrate.c            |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 351c3b7f93a1..82c9bf506b79 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ enum mapping_flags {
 	/* writeback related tags are not used */
 	AS_NO_WRITEBACK_TAGS = 5,
 	AS_LARGE_FOLIO_SUPPORT = 6,
-	AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS,	/* Call ->release_folio(), even if no private data */
+	AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS = 7,	/* Call ->release_folio(), even if no private data */
+	AS_UNMOVABLE	= 8,	/* The mapping cannot be moved, ever */
 };
 
 /**
@@ -289,6 +290,22 @@ static inline void mapping_clear_release_always(struct address_space *mapping)
 	clear_bit(AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS, &mapping->flags);
 }
 
+static inline void mapping_set_unmovable(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+	/*
+	 * It's expected unmovable mappings are also unevictable. Compaction
+	 * migrate scanner (isolate_migratepages_block()) relies on this to
+	 * reduce page locking.
+	 */
+	set_bit(AS_UNEVICTABLE, &mapping->flags);
+	set_bit(AS_UNMOVABLE, &mapping->flags);
+}
+
+static inline bool mapping_unmovable(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+	return test_bit(AS_UNMOVABLE, &mapping->flags);
+}
+
 static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(struct address_space * mapping)
 {
 	return mapping->gfp_mask;
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 38c8d216c6a3..12b828aed7c8 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 
 	/* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
 	for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
+		bool is_dirty, is_unevictable;
 
 		if (skip_on_failure && low_pfn >= next_skip_pfn) {
 			/*
@@ -1080,8 +1081,10 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		if (!folio_test_lru(folio))
 			goto isolate_fail_put;
 
+		is_unevictable = folio_test_unevictable(folio);
+
 		/* Compaction might skip unevictable pages but CMA takes them */
-		if (!(mode & ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE) && folio_test_unevictable(folio))
+		if (!(mode & ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE) && is_unevictable)
 			goto isolate_fail_put;
 
 		/*
@@ -1093,26 +1096,42 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		if ((mode & ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE) && folio_test_writeback(folio))
 			goto isolate_fail_put;
 
-		if ((mode & ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE) && folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
-			bool migrate_dirty;
+		is_dirty = folio_test_dirty(folio);
+
+		if (((mode & ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE) && is_dirty) ||
+		    (mapping && is_unevictable)) {
+			bool migrate_dirty = true;
+			bool is_unmovable;
 
 			/*
 			 * Only folios without mappings or that have
-			 * a ->migrate_folio callback are possible to
-			 * migrate without blocking.  However, we may
-			 * be racing with truncation, which can free
-			 * the mapping.  Truncation holds the folio lock
-			 * until after the folio is removed from the page
-			 * cache so holding it ourselves is sufficient.
+			 * a ->migrate_folio callback are possible to migrate
+			 * without blocking.
+			 *
+			 * Folios from unmovable mappings are not migratable.
+			 *
+			 * However, we can be racing with truncation, which can
+			 * free the mapping that we need to check. Truncation
+			 * holds the folio lock until after the folio is removed
+			 * from the page so holding it ourselves is sufficient.
+			 *
+			 * To avoid locking the folio just to check unmovable,
+			 * assume every unmovable folio is also unevictable,
+			 * which is a cheaper test.  If our assumption goes
+			 * wrong, it's not a correctness bug, just potentially
+			 * wasted cycles.
 			 */
 			if (!folio_trylock(folio))
 				goto isolate_fail_put;
 
 			mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
-			migrate_dirty = !mapping ||
-					mapping->a_ops->migrate_folio;
+			if ((mode & ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE) && is_dirty) {
+				migrate_dirty = !mapping ||
+						mapping->a_ops->migrate_folio;
+			}
+			is_unmovable = mapping && mapping_unmovable(mapping);
 			folio_unlock(folio);
-			if (!migrate_dirty)
+			if (!migrate_dirty || is_unmovable)
 				goto isolate_fail_put;
 		}
 
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index b7fa020003f3..3d25c145098d 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -953,6 +953,8 @@ static int move_to_new_folio(struct folio *dst, struct folio *src,
 
 		if (!mapping)
 			rc = migrate_folio(mapping, dst, src, mode);
+		else if (mapping_unmovable(mapping))
+			rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		else if (mapping->a_ops->migrate_folio)
 			/*
 			 * Most folios have a mapping and most filesystems
-- 
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog