Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757425AbXKGG3R (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 01:29:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750821AbXKGG3G (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 01:29:06 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:49917 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755194AbXKGG3F (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 01:29:05 -0500 Message-ID: <47315B39.5060204@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:29:13 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Avi Kivity , Gregory Haskins , Dor Laor , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Use of virtio device IDs References: <4730A15A.6070001@us.ibm.com> <4731334A.6090405@gmail.com> <47314FBD.1070505@qumranet.com> <200711071709.47192.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200711071709.47192.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1674 Lines: 47 Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 16:40:13 Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Gregory Haskins wrote: >> >>> but FWIW: This is a major motivation for the reason that the >>> IOQ stuff I posted a while back used strings for device identification >>> instead of a fixed length, centrally managed namespace like PCI >>> vendor/dev-id. Then you can just name your device something reasonably >>> unique (e.g. "qumranet::veth", or "ibm-pvirt-clock"). >>> >> I dislike strings. They make it look as if you have a nice extensible >> interface, where in reality you have a poorly documented interface which >> leads to poor interoperability. >> > > Yes, you end up with exactly names like "qumranet::veth" > and "ibm-pvirt-clock". I would recommend looking very hard at /proc, Open > Firmware on a modern system, or the Xen store, to see what a lack of > limitation can do to you :) > > >> We will support non-pci for s390, but in order to support Windows and >> older Linux PCI is necessary. >> > > The aim is that PCI support is clean, but that we're not really tied to PCI. > I think we're getting closer with the recent config changes. > Yes, my main desire was to ensure that we had a clean PCI ABI that would be natural to implement on a platform like Windows. I think with the recent config_ops refactoring, we can now do that. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Cheers, > Rusty. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/