Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758156AbXKGQtv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:49:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750819AbXKGQti (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:49:38 -0500 Received: from rayleigh.systella.fr ([213.41.184.253]:41662 "EHLO rayleigh.systella.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755AbXKGQth (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:49:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4731EC64.3050903@systella.fr> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:48:36 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=EBl?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux sparc64; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 Iceape/1.1.4 (Debian-1.1.4-1) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Ebbert CC: Neil Brown , Justin Piszcz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23.1: mdadm/raid5 hung/d-state References: <18222.16003.92062.970530@notabene.brown> <472ED613.8050101@systella.fr> <4731EA2B.5000806@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4731EA2B.5000806@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.8 (rayleigh.systella.fr [192.168.254.1]); Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:48:42 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3186 Lines: 79 Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 11/05/2007 03:36 AM, BERTRAND Jo?l wrote: >> Neil Brown wrote: >>> On Sunday November 4, jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com wrote: >>>> # ps auxww | grep D >>>> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND >>>> root 273 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Oct21 14:40 >>>> [pdflush] >>>> root 274 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Oct21 13:00 >>>> [pdflush] >>>> >>>> After several days/weeks, this is the second time this has happened, >>>> while doing regular file I/O (decompressing a file), everything on >>>> the device went into D-state. >>> At a guess (I haven't looked closely) I'd say it is the bug that was >>> meant to be fixed by >>> >>> commit 4ae3f847e49e3787eca91bced31f8fd328d50496 >>> >>> except that patch applied badly and needed to be fixed with >>> the following patch (not in git yet). >>> These have been sent to stable@ and should be in the queue for 2.6.23.2 >> My linux-2.6.23/drivers/md/raid5.c contains your patch for a long >> time : >> >> ... >> spin_lock(&sh->lock); >> clear_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state); >> clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state); >> >> s.syncing = test_bit(STRIPE_SYNCING, &sh->state); >> s.expanding = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state); >> s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state); >> /* Now to look around and see what can be done */ >> >> /* clean-up completed biofill operations */ >> if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete)) { >> clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending); >> clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack); >> clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete); >> } >> >> rcu_read_lock(); >> for (i=disks; i--; ) { >> mdk_rdev_t *rdev; >> struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i]; >> ... >> >> but it doesn't fix this bug. >> > > Did that chunk starting with "clean-up completed biofill operations" end > up where it belongs? The patch with the big context moves it to a different > place from where the original one puts it when applied to 2.6.23... > > Lately I've seen several problems where the context isn't enough to make > a patch apply properly when some offsets have changed. In some cases a > patch won't apply at all because two nearly-identical areas are being > changed and the first chunk gets applied where the second one should, > leaving nowhere for the second chunk to apply. I always apply this kind of patches by hands, and no by patch command. Last patch sent here seems to fix this bug : gershwin:[/usr/scripts] > cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md7 : active raid1 sdi1[2] md_d0p1[0] 1464725632 blocks [2/1] [U_] [=====>...............] recovery = 27.1% (396992504/1464725632) finish=1040.3min speed=17104K/sec Regards, JKB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/