Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230912090051.4014114-17-ardb@google.com> <20230912090051.4014114-25-ardb@google.com>
 <ZQQgv7VWUa3VGqbb@gmail.com> <CAMj1kXGxv_Nt4__ETG-e0vXC7z8SyirCw5NO0p6gsWRbLfbNAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQR66uQOGCaVQlNu@gmail.com> <ZQR8FptFJ+8Ht7Y3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZQR8FptFJ+8Ht7Y3@gmail.com>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:48:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEmEfngtuyEkYuzgif14E-338z1XNdRpGizK8TvywGX6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/boot: Drop references to startup_64
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@google.com>, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@ispras.ru>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 17:45, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Very weird - could it have gotten lost in the sending process, on your
> > side?
>


Lore does have them but I have no idea whose end caused this - I
recently switched to Google's internal infrastructure for outgoing GIT
email as our network does not permit outgoing SMTP to kernel.org but
this is the first time I heard of a potential issue of this nature.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230912090051.4014114-24-ardb@google.com/T/#u
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230912090051.4014114-26-ardb@google.com/T/#u


> In any case I've dropped patch #8 from tip:x86/boot as well - the first 6
> patches arrived fine and are in the intended order.
>
> Once the boot problem has been resolved, mind resending the rest?
>
> There are no changes in -tip that should be interfering: tip:x86/boot has
> an upstream base.
>

Yeah I'll respin and resend. Thanks.