Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:11:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:11:04 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([209.173.204.2]:63627 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:10:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 17:10:20 -0600 (CST) From: Oliver Xymoron To: Marcelo Tosatti cc: Dan Kegel , Subject: re: Linux 2.4.17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > Here it is... > > > > > > > > > final: > > > > > > - Fix more loopback deadlocks (Andrea Arcangeli) > > > - Make Alpha with Nautilus chipset and > > > Irongate chipset configuration compile > > > correctly (Michal Jaegermann) > > > > Um, what happened to the idea of 'no changes between the last > > release candidate and final'? > > I haven't said that, did I? No, but it's a good idea. There's always the risk of breaking something and you don't want to introduce a disk-eating bug between -rc and -final. It's better to ship one more -rc and wait a day before -final. If you don't, people will just get in the habit of waiting a day after -final to be safe. > I said I would make -rc kernels which would not add any new _feature_. That's less important. -- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/