Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759299AbXKGR56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:57:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754703AbXKGR5u (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:57:50 -0500 Received: from madara.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.124]:62776 "EHLO madara.hpl.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754536AbXKGR5t (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:57:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:57:42 -0800 From: Stephane Eranian To: Greg KH Cc: Andrew Morton , perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix up perfmon to build on -mm Message-ID: <20071107175742.GJ14646@frankl.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: eranian@hpl.hp.com References: <20071107003454.GA13374@kroah.com> <20071107134255.GE14646@frankl.hpl.hp.com> <20071107174747.GA9918@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071107174747.GA9918@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. E-mail: eranian@hpl.hp.com X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: eranian@hpl.hp.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1370 Lines: 39 Greg, On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:47:47AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > Greg, > > > > Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce. > > you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit: > > > > e83278f879e52ecee025effe9ad509fd51e4a516 > > Thanks, that looks a lot better. > > Do you want me to send you patches based on this tree to help clean up > the sysfs usage now that it's documented? > Yes, send me the patches. But from what you were saying earlier it seems I would need an extra sysfs patches to make this compile. Is that particular patch already in Linus's tree? > Also, a lot of your per-cpu sysfs files should probably move to debugfs > as they are for debugging only, right? No need to clutter up sysfs with > them when only the very few perfmon developers would be needing access > to them. > Yes, this is mostly debugging. If debugfs is meant for this, then I'll be happy to move this stuff over there. Is there some good example of how I could do that based on my current sysfs code? Thanks. -- -Stephane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/