Received: by 2002:a05:7412:31a9:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id et41csp5462671rdb; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 19:49:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFyK9Guj6lPdN7m+Fcn/XoapFEY9EZLrlCvFQWZj1MZ1Oo38MaM6aVIbkmpuZ1Nuopuhbj/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:e84:b0:3a8:7f65:a7a with SMTP id k4-20020a0568080e8400b003a87f650a7amr6982104oil.36.1694918945312; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 19:49:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1694918945; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tSt7tcpXtCUQs13MuJRNUWptLmteeb8UoYIPF4XLbqhIF4VQHfO+qgAU4HKE0qpOG6 ZqWOH/sDS0Zu+h3/E40I0Z9SRKnNQpmkR0u+KsCabPmPSVv+NIB6ocx0y/sjDIOcf1uT NvktIf6QhGL5AP1LV3/Vu7qRhmY1/Y+KbXRtXs1aLi07cPeRr53gNht4Rj01DhXB8A6Z lzJte2EB2if46r7L+c2mS9T9939GDJUSD23RQA+z32k3oCse2dFH8boPsmsij6Jj4HOC Ry/cf2t4pLU+r7ZbRa77SODyp0vOe6+XyymLjxD3duj7myoUrMnfrKbAUWJKooycLk8n 2cRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=WlnhjD1MkrJJ6FAxJ77UnrNvccygyZDRq3cse/j0cSA=; fh=hVHpN4Dtc21a8dRoC9I6loW5Hwd2xg0BUq+dIbukc+I=; b=ILa5ZBQLDjaKYZil5ksfoiddx5ZUCnXb42RliPf/fcCIzcF7AGBucBRIvjYcF7dvT2 4k5VP1oEykwGe/tKKGVKsRR1PdGJrvvBM/dT23ZiIqFh8PQLcYh/ywG6AgjeCWM3uasi qnH7d4zvKOxQn0T3Fw+Wx1HKCZ0ZiWxuft9Biwf3pc6s6X8R47CVqyvr/Epg+VOJdY3K y3qflejX65x138Z3E8Isos5grMG1jW0h4IzpgfTV48/joU7/XEXk8u54cX3sE2fbC009 bFNwV+xOjjgDYUYzyHlzwRg02Wq4nYiObu9q3NsP5NYKJXKzSYFSZNQg9vb7NZzfQaRG 6CKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=DzIgKbtR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from fry.vger.email (fry.vger.email. [23.128.96.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v5-20020a17090a898500b00253555e5f95si5789364pjn.153.2023.09.16.19.49.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Sep 2023 19:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=DzIgKbtR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by fry.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF42983B1847; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 03:28:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at fry.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238905AbjIPK1n (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 16 Sep 2023 06:27:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50442 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234989AbjIPK1K (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2023 06:27:10 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D55FCEC for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 03:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1694860025; x=1726396025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=NpYRpck12yRE0afPagiZhDKRlGxV/J6TEPLL4JmygBU=; b=DzIgKbtRbrEpwsHadt0ZTCBi/7S5+nhtOYSBEUARLGN30GSGz6/9vb1K Ebd8NJmingtt/N33w1sB7mFaTwZTwxfemiznlGx+i1OdgDA+NZ4HVbEMG OjmS5e4fk6BrJ4TXWdQyfzvecLosEATiVa0wyPNWhb0ZNoMVgxoioS+q0 C3Tem6Z4jhG4x4ZGTwRn4hsb7uD9sGuegtx5Idyshs0Ja7RMP+1wPHBhC 1dFM3M+XwCnIUfny6NBYi95HR/DEEtjz90b2+twYxisWYV5tWVnicN2TP /CoJg13OqE4UZENNVf5OQ/Zp4R1qe7po+8gtZOm19CYRrKYaoOqU9qDJI Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10834"; a="410358060" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,152,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="410358060" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2023 03:25:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10834"; a="695000890" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,152,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="695000890" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2023 03:24:59 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97-RC0) (envelope-from ) id 1qhSTw-0000000F5fe-4AzJ; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:24:56 +0300 Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:24:56 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Huacai Chen Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: Add missing headers Message-ID: References: <20230914103445.511285-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on fry.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (fry.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 16 Sep 2023 03:28:19 -0700 (PDT) On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:36:24AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 2:53 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:25:22PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > > > Thank you for your patch, can this patch solve the problem below? > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309072237.9zxMv4MZ-lkp@intel.com/T/#u > > > > Nope, this just adds missing includes. > > No functional change, so warnings will still be there. > But I think a patch should solve a problem. No, that problem is static analyser concern, not the compiler nor linker. > If we don't get a build > error or warning without this patch, does that mean the 'missing' > headers are actually included indirectly? I might be missing something, but I do not see any build error in the above message. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko