Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35;
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:17:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        max.zhen@amd.com, sonal.santan@amd.com,
        stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 0/5] Generate device tree node for pci devices
Message-ID: <ZQf5huX2AMuf9kHC@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <1692120000-46900-1-git-send-email-lizhi.hou@amd.com>
 <ZP96feVs2ev7098Y@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAL_JsqKfQJFrd8MOdjW55cYdEb8yyPyR+P3ran9+X3dCwUgdyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQGaSr+G5qu/8nJZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20230915193008.6d87b8a0@bootlin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230915193008.6d87b8a0@bootlin.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 07:30:08PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:17:30 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:12:04PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:37 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:  
> > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:19:55AM -0700, Lizhi Hou wrote:  

...

> > > > Can you point out to the ACPI excerpt(s) of the description of anything related
> > > > to the device(s) in question?  
> > > 
> > > I don't understand what you are asking for.  
> > 
> > Through the email thread it was mentioned that this series was tested on the
> > ACPI enabled platform, Jonathan (IIRC) asked why do we need to have a shadow
> > DT for the something that ACPI already describes. That's why I'm trying to
> > understand if it's the case. and if so, how can we improve the approach.
> 
> Patches from Frank Rowand series [1] are needed to create an of_root_node if a DT
> was not provided by the firmware, bootloader, etc that run the kernel.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220624034327.2542112-1-frowand.list@gmail.com/
> 
> Current Lizhi's series creates nodes from the PCI host node during the PCI
> enumeration. It creates PCI-PCI bridge and PCI device nodes.
> 
> I use these series on an ACPI system.
> 
> I need one more missing component: the node related to the PCI host bridge
> This was the purpose of Clement's work. This work was not sent upstream yet and I
> am working on it in order to have a full tree from the of_root to the PCI device
> ie:
>  of_root                  <-- Frank Rowand series 
>    + of_host_pci_bridge   <-- Clement's work
>        + pci_bridge       <-- Current Lizhi series
>            + pci_bridge   <-- Current Lizhi series
>             ...
>              + pci_dev    <-- Current Lizhi series
> 
> Hope that this status helped.

Thanks for the explanation! I suppose it's better to have three series combined
into one and being sent with a better cover letter to explain all this. Also it
might make sense (in my opinion) to Cc Jonathan (I did it here). Sorry, Jonathan,
if you are not wanting this.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko