Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:52:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:51:57 -0500 Received: from norma.kjist.ac.kr ([203.237.41.18]:23681 "EHLO norma.kjist.ac.kr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:51:48 -0500 Message-ID: <3C23D919.9080606@nospam.com> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 09:51:37 +0900 From: Hugh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux alpha; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: ko, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reiserfs error in 2.4.17-rc1 and rc2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090205020504050607080501" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090205020504050607080501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am the one who started this this thread. I am very sorry. I found that the machine I had the reiserfs error was running on the 2.4.17-pre6, not one of those rc1 or rc2. Beside that, I still have a concern on the security level of the reiserfs in general. On the linux-kernel list, I see more articles on the troubles of reiserfs than on the troubles of ext3. Is ext3 more stabilized by now or is ext3 less used in the linux community? Again, my apology for the misinformation in the original article. Best regards, Hugh --------------090205020504050607080501 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Reiserfs error in 2.4.17-rc1 and rc2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Reiserfs error in 2.4.17-rc1 and rc2" X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Message-ID: <3C22A2B5.3010205@nospam.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:47:17 +0900 From: Hugh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux alpha; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: ko, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Reiserfs error in 2.4.17-rc1 and rc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My linux partitions are all Reiserfs format right now. I moved from 2.4.17-pre1 to 2.4.17-rc2. On such During the backup at night, I got a strange error saying in the line of ".... journaling ... write/buffer ..." in a plain user's console. I immediately realized that it is reiserfs related. There are a lot of reiserfs users, especially in the SuSE camp. If the kernel has a serious bug related to Reiserfs, that kernel should be marked as "Don't use". I went back to 2.4.17-pre1 and trying to do "reiserfsck" on all my partitions. BTW, "reiserfsck" on a 36GB SCSI driver takes almost forever. Is it normal? I am seriously concerned with the integrity of my data. Should I switch back to ext2 for my data partition? Thanks for the information in advance Best regards, G. Hugh Song --------------090205020504050607080501-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/