Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:15:52 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
Cc:     cristian.marussi@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
        andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support
Message-ID: <20230918151552.n3jvw2qqi5tmyfbb@bogus>
References: <20230718160833.36397-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
 <20230911194359.27547-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
 <0efe305e-031b-bdf5-0268-ca1c6d562653@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0efe305e-031b-bdf5-0268-ca1c6d562653@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 08:01:26AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> Gentle Ping!
> 

I will take a look at this later this week. That said, I am unable be
gauge the urgency based on you ping here. You have shown the same urgency
last time for a feature that I queued promptly just to know that it was
abandon within couple of days. So I don't want to rush here simply based
on the number of pings here. I need to understand that it is really that
important. For now, I am thinking of skipping even v6.7 just to allow
some time for Qcom to make up its mind and be absolutely sure this is what
they *really* want this time.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep