Message-ID: <4733113E.4090806@davidnewall.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:08:06 +1030
From: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ciol <ciol13@gmail.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
References: <fgtfqa$h9j$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <fgtfqa$h9j$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 854
Lines: 16

ciol wrote:
> * Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't 
> trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why) 

I'm new to LKML, and because this is "my first release" I've held off 
saying that the development model scares me.  No doubt I need to see it 
through a couple of releases, minimum.  If I was less sanguine I might 
say something about how often "this is tested and ready to be pushed 
upstream" presages "the system is broken and doesn't work."  I think if 
most CIOs monitored the list they'd never let Linux anywhere near their 
business systems.  It's scary!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/