Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:53:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] x86: apicdef.h unification
In-Reply-To: <20071108102411.GG20836@erda.amd.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.0.999.0711081852170.1314@www.tglx.de>
References: <20071106183645.951275000@amd.com>
 <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711062130200.3628@localhost.localdomain>
 <20071108102411.GG20836@erda.amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 896
Lines: 26


On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Robert Richter wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> On 06.11.07 21:32:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Thanks for doing this, but please check the x86 git repository
> > (cleanup / mm branch) for stuff which has been worked on already.
> > 
> > Maybe we need some coordination for this.
> 
> Is it for sure that the x86/cleanup tree will go upstream soon and the
> source will not change as much? The question is what code base to use
> for new patches? I want to keep the porting effort as small as
> possible.

We'll add patches on top of the cleanup branch. There should be not much 
changes, except if we have real functional changes.

	tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/