Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
Message-ID: <a5b25ee07245125fac4bbdc3b3604758251907d2.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/4] vsock/virtio/vhost: MSG_ZEROCOPY
 preparations
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
        Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@sberdevices.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:19:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <yys5jgwkukvfyrgfz6txxzqc7el5megf2xntnk6j4ausvjdgld@7aan4quqy4bs>
References: <20230916130918.4105122-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
         <b5873e36-fe8c-85e8-e11b-4ccec386c015@salutedevices.com>
         <yys5jgwkukvfyrgfz6txxzqc7el5megf2xntnk6j4ausvjdgld@7aan4quqy4bs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 09:54 +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:56:00PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >=20
> > thanks for review! So when this patchset will be merged to net-next,
> > I'll start sending next part of MSG_ZEROCOPY patchset, e.g. AF_VSOCK +
> > Documentation/ patches.
>=20
> Ack, if it is not a very big series, maybe better to include also the
> tests so we can run them before merge the feature.

I understand that at least 2 follow-up series are waiting for this, one
of them targeting net-next and the bigger one targeting the virtio
tree. Am I correct?

DaveM suggests this should go via the virtio tree, too. Any different
opinion?

Thanks!

Paolo