Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:43:34 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree
Message-ID: <20230919154334.GD348037@frogsfrogsfrogs>
References: <20230915093953.310503ee@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20230918205206.GA348037@frogsfrogsfrogs>
 <20230919-zensieren-plakat-05a044361e57@brauner>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230919-zensieren-plakat-05a044361e57@brauner>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 02:34:01PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 01:52:06PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:39:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > The following commit is also in the iomap tree as a different commit
> > > (but the same patch):
> > > 
> > >   de5b0b257ee3 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > > 
> > > This is commit
> > > 
> > >   4aa8cdd5e523 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > > 
> > > in the iomap tree.
> > 
> > Christian, do you want to push this to Linus instead of me?  I've a
> > couple more fixes that I'm about to send out to fsdevel and could just
> > roll all the iomap stuff into a single branch... but if you were about
> > to this to Linus I don't mind letting that happen.
> 
> So I was about to send a pull request tomorrow. I thought I was supposed
> to pick up iomap stuff. Let me know what you prefer. I can easily drop
> this patch. :)

I'll push that patch, then.

In general, you can fling any non-trivial iomap patches at me, since I
will likely want to run them through my testing cloud anyway.

(And just to be clear: I don't mind if you push things like trivial api
cleanups that are part of another series through your main vfs tree.)

--D