Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762966AbXKHU0G (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 15:26:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761348AbXKHUZz (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 15:25:55 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:14178 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761281AbXKHUZy (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 15:25:54 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JcoXCcQ+KsmH5/1KGlqmsJakJOAsKTNGDQ4TIVBsOXpv0mWgGfT23WkmYyJEq9T3HEo4fGqLkbXq6nk/L7ziK9QtxTRpvuvMNXOAl6Pkuu8q8zJA19sicMNqpEP+xaSqSlCq6raqJLQCGjn/aHxVICM26NQ6Atr1H+hKzbjRTbI= Message-ID: <68676e00711081225n6230538w30bf38d359ddd447@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:25:49 +0100 From: "Luca Tettamanti" To: "Tejun Heo" Subject: Re: sata NCQ blacklist entry Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "IDE/ATA development list" In-Reply-To: <4731B5DD.1060203@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071107111813.GA9064@dudweiler.stuttgart.redhat.com> <4731B5DD.1060203@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1819 Lines: 39 On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Florian La Roche wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going > > into the kernel. > > This Fujitsu drive also gives me spurious command completions. Detailed > > output also available at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366181. > > > > Let me know if you need more info or anything else. > > > > --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c > > +++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c > > @@ -4222,6 +4222,7 @@ > > { "WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > > { "WDC WD3200AAJS-00RYA0", "12.01B01", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > > { "FUJITSU MHV2080BH", "00840028", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > > + { "FUJITSU MHW2160BJ G2", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > > { "ST9120822AS", "3.CLF", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > > { "ST9160821AS", "3.CLF", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > > { "ST9160821AS", "3.ALD", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > > Thanks. We're currently trying to find out what's actually going on > with all these drives. At first, drives which got blacklisted aren't > many and made sense (had other problems with NCQ, etc..) but with new > generation drives from many vendors showing the same symptom, we aren't > too sure now. Is there a way to tell whether Windows is using NCQ or not? I checked the system log (or whatever it's called) on my notebook and is clean but I'm not sure it's using NCQ (I don't even know if it'd log spurious completions somewhere). Luca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/