Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.31;
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:12:23 -0400
From:   =?utf-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4=?= Prado 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@google.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>,
        James Lo <james.lo@mediatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spmi: mtk-pmif: Serialize PMIF status check and
 command submission
Message-ID: <7b407eda-702a-444a-b644-5e8dc31f3991@notapiano>
References: <20230724154739.493724-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
 <a4684a81-eb04-492a-bff6-a5ff78fe6b0f@notapiano>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <a4684a81-eb04-492a-bff6-a5ff78fe6b0f@notapiano>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 06:03:53PM -0400, N?colas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:47:33AM -0400, N?colas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > Before writing the read or write command to the SPMI arbiter through the
> > PMIF interface, the current status of the channel is checked to ensure
> > it is idle. However, since the status only changes from idle when the
> > command is written, it is possible for two concurrent calls to determine
> > that the channel is idle and simultaneously send their commands. At this
> > point the PMIF interface hangs, with the status register no longer being
> > updated, and thus causing all subsequent operations to time out.
> > 
> > This was observed on the mt8195-cherry-tomato-r2 machine, particularly
> > after commit 46600ab142f8 ("regulator: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for
> > drivers between 5.10 and 5.15") was applied, since then the two MT6315
> > devices present on the SPMI bus would probe assynchronously and
> > sometimes (during probe or at a later point) read the bus
> > simultaneously, breaking the PMIF interface and consequently slowing
> > down the whole system.
> > 
> > To fix the issue at its root cause, introduce locking around the channel
> > status check and the command write, so that both become an atomic
> > operation, preventing race conditions between two (or more) SPMI bus
> > read/write operations. A spinlock is used since this is a fast bus, as
> > indicated by the usage of the atomic variant of readl_poll, and
> > '.fast_io = true' being used in the mt6315 driver, so spinlocks are
> > already used for the regmap access.
> > 
> > Fixes: b45b3ccef8c0 ("spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192")
> > Signed-off-by: N?colas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> gentle ping on this one. MT8195 Chromebooks sometimes boot to a broken state
> without it.

Hi Stephen,

once again kindling reminding you of this important fix for MediaTek platforms,
solving a real issue impacting basic functionality observed on the MT8195
Chromebook.

Thanks,
N?colas