Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Message-ID: <ee19e076-8f9c-c5b2-3e25-2832dbdab25b@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:32:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-tsens: Add ipq5018
 compatible
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
        agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
        srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
        thara.gopinath@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
References: <20230915121504.806672-1-quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
 <20230915121504.806672-2-quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
 <03b0cafa-49c7-8838-b116-927c9649cbd3@linaro.org>
 <f5aee51d-0345-1294-a85b-ea96ed937685@linaro.org>
 <1f09339e-b3b5-874c-4874-199e8c7ae890@quicinc.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <1f09339e-b3b5-874c-4874-199e8c7ae890@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 19/09/2023 09:22, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/15/2023 6:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/09/2023 14:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/09/2023 14:15, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>> IPQ5018 has tsens v1.0 block with 4 sensors and 1 interrupt.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   [v2] Sorted the compatible and removed example
>>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> No, unreviewed. Your driver says it is not compatible with
>> qcom,tsens-v1. This does not look right :/
>>
> 
>   Yes it is V1 IP, but since there is no RPM, to enable the IP/SENSORS
>   have to do those steps after calling init_common. Similar reason
>   added a new feat as well in patch #2 as well. Hence for this,
>   new compatible was required.

I dud not write about new or old compatible ("compatible" as noun). I
wrote that it is not compatible ("compatible" as adjective) with v1.

Best regards,
Krzysztof