Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761114AbXKIBGb (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:06:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751811AbXKIBGE (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:06:04 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]:36137 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbXKIBGA (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:06:00 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jyGNu0Am4y+XMztQBhZSRlm1OMB/8doqDZZyxbyRwe8n5PtORCvjzxrYgx3YLJduZY7r4SxsJXQI/s0yjzWb1mZTppjmZRmmd4pWlRO2cg3VJyGogU1ZtMqrA6mLiYIt4Q+TdIOhExTrS8o6LwwCM57pt/lUwYawbLM80aomg4Y= Message-ID: <68676e00711081608w53c497aciec60d19f2e71d230@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 01:08:26 +0100 From: "Luca Tettamanti" To: "Robert Hancock" Subject: Re: sata NCQ blacklist entry Cc: "Tejun Heo" , jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "IDE/ATA development list" In-Reply-To: <47339C88.9050300@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47339C88.9050300@shaw.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2322 Lines: 47 On Nov 9, 2007 12:32 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Florian La Roche wrote: > >>> Hello all, > >>> > >>> I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going > >>> into the kernel. > >>> This Fujitsu drive also gives me spurious command completions. Detailed > >>> output also available at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366181. > >>> > >>> Let me know if you need more info or anything else. > >>> > >>> --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c > >>> +++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c > >>> @@ -4222,6 +4222,7 @@ > >>> { "WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > >>> { "WDC WD3200AAJS-00RYA0", "12.01B01", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > >>> { "FUJITSU MHV2080BH", "00840028", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > >>> + { "FUJITSU MHW2160BJ G2", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > >>> { "ST9120822AS", "3.CLF", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > >>> { "ST9160821AS", "3.CLF", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > >>> { "ST9160821AS", "3.ALD", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > >> Thanks. We're currently trying to find out what's actually going on > >> with all these drives. At first, drives which got blacklisted aren't > >> many and made sense (had other problems with NCQ, etc..) but with new > >> generation drives from many vendors showing the same symptom, we aren't > >> too sure now. > > > > Is there a way to tell whether Windows is using NCQ or not? I checked > > the system log (or whatever it's called) on my notebook and is clean > > but I'm not sure it's using NCQ (I don't even know if it'd log > > spurious completions somewhere). > > Which driver is installed for the SATA controller in Windows, the > chipset-manufacturer-provided AHCI driver or the default Microsoft > driver? You'd need the AHCI driver installed for NCQ to be used. I'm aware of this. I'm using the AHCI driver (from Intel). Still, I don't know if it's really used or limited like under Linux. Luca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/