Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752436AbXKIJtS (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:49:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751510AbXKIJtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:49:08 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:2083 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501AbXKIJtH (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:49:07 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,394,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="375883945" Subject: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:47:52 +0800 Message-Id: <1194601672.20251.60.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.2 (2.9.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1010 Lines: 23 Comparing with 2.6.23, iozone sequential write/rewrite (512M) has 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1. 2.6.24-rc2 has the same regression. My machine has 8 processor cores and 8GB memory. By bisect, I located patch http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=04fbfdc14e5f48463820d6b9807daa5e9c92c51f. Another behavior: with kernel 2.6.23, if I run iozone for many times after rebooting machine, the result looks stable. But with 2.6.24-rc1, the first run of iozone got a very small result and following run has 4Xorig_result. What I reported is the regression of 2nd/3rd run, because first run has bigger regression. I also tried to change /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio,dirty_backgroud_ratio and didn't get improvement. -yanmin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/