Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
Message-ID: <f1198daa6d068c76b8ce692ad313698c34d0d1a3.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/4] vsock/virtio/vhost: MSG_ZEROCOPY
 preparations
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc:     Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@sberdevices.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:06:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20230919223700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20230916130918.4105122-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
         <b5873e36-fe8c-85e8-e11b-4ccec386c015@salutedevices.com>
         <yys5jgwkukvfyrgfz6txxzqc7el5megf2xntnk6j4ausvjdgld@7aan4quqy4bs>
         <a5b25ee07245125fac4bbdc3b3604758251907d2.camel@redhat.com>
         <hq67e2b3ljfjikvbaneczdve3fzg3dl5ziyc7xtujyqesp6dzm@fh5nqkptpb4n>
         <20230919223700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 22:38 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:35:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:19:54PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> >=20
> > > DaveM suggests this should go via the virtio tree, too. Any different
> > > opinion?
> >=20
> > For this series should be fine, I'm not sure about the next series.
> > Merging this with the virtio tree, then it forces us to do it for
> > followup as well right?
> >=20
> > In theory followup is more on the core, so better with net-next, but
> > it's also true that for now only virtio transports support it, so it
> > might be okay to continue with virtio.
> >=20
> > @Michael WDYT?
> >=20
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
>=20
> I didn't get DaveM's mail - was this off-list?

Yes, that was off-list co-ordination.

> I think net-next is easier because the follow up belongs in net-next.
> But if not I can take it, sure. Let me know.

Since there is agreement on that route, we will take it (likely
tomorrow).

Cheers,

Paolo