Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.31;
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:29:34 -0400
From:   Abdel Alkuor <alkuor@gmail.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        abdelalkuor@geotab.com, ryanmacdonald@geotab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/15] USB: typec: Add cmd timeout and response delay
Message-ID: <ZQsBzl2LBj0SQAqt@primary>
References: <20230917152639.21443-1-alkuor@gmail.com>
 <20230917152639.21443-3-alkuor@gmail.com>
 <ZQgqII6+wplL8AjG@kuha.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZQgqII6+wplL8AjG@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 01:44:48PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 11:26:26AM -0400, Abdel Alkuor wrote:
> > Some commands in tps25750 take longer than 1 second
> > to complete, and some responses need some delay before
> > the result becomes available.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abdel Alkuor <alkuor@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> > index 37b56ce75f39..a8aee4e1aeba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> > @@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ static void tps6598x_disconnect(struct tps6598x *tps, u32 status)
> >  
> >  static int tps6598x_exec_cmd(struct tps6598x *tps, const char *cmd,
> >  			     size_t in_len, u8 *in_data,
> > -			     size_t out_len, u8 *out_data)
> > +			     size_t out_len, u8 *out_data,
> > +			     u32 cmd_timeout_ms, u32 res_delay_ms)
> 
> It looks like 1s/0s is still the "default", so you could have just
> made this old function a wrapper:
> 
> static int tps6598x_exec_cmd(struct tps6598x *tps, const char *cmd,
> 			     size_t in_len, u8 *in_data,
> 			     size_t out_len, u8 *out_data)
> {
>         return tps6598x_exec_cmd_tmo(tps, cmd, in_len, in_data, out_len, out_data, 1000, 0);
> }
Sounds good. I will change it in v6.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -- 
> heikki

Thanks,
Abdel