Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:30:02 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage
 OPP tables directly by its FW
Message-ID: <20230921133002.dfyjkoe5f2pqxhc6@bogus>
References: <20230825112633.236607-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
 <20230825112633.236607-13-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
 <20230921112019.gftlr5ys3yw2nwgw@bogus>
 <CAPDyKFpkjOFhjKMY=4dDgngi7PftE_4c+4dHE2KcGAGYnjk6-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpkjOFhjKMY=4dDgngi7PftE_4c+4dHE2KcGAGYnjk6-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:20, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:32PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > In some cases the OPP tables aren't specified in device tree, but rather
> > > encoded in the FW. To allow a genpd provider to specify them dynamically
> > > instead, let's add a new genpd flag, GENPD_FLAG_OPP_TABLE_FW.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >       - None.
> > >
> >
> > Just checking if I need Rafael's ack here or that is OK as you are
> > co-maintainer ? Again asking explicitly to ensure arm-soc is happy when
> > I send PR.
> 
> This should be fine for you to pick up. Rafael would have objected if
> this was something that he didn't like. Moreover, there's no other
> patches being queued for genpd at this moment so no worries of
> conflicts.
> 

Fair enough :), but I just wanted to confirm.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep