Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:55:37 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/367] 5.4.257-rc1 review
Message-ID: <8c686e7b-a770-4336-a047-4f2e2739405f@roeck-us.net>
References: <20230920112858.471730572@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230920112858.471730572@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:26:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.257 release.
> There are 367 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:28:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 154 pass: 152 fail: 2
Failed builds:
	i386:tools/perf
	x86_64:tools/perf
Qemu test results:
	total: 464 pass: 464 fail: 0

libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_object__close’:
libbpf.c:4205:15: error: ‘struct bpf_object’ has no member named ‘btf_vmlinux’

Old question: Should we stop build testing perf on older kernels ?
If so, why are perf patches backported ?

Guenter