Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 12:36:44 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] params: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()
Message-ID: <ZQwOrCtkhVSikWhE@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230912150551.401537-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <ZQiBhRCGG13CNWqt@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZQuPNzgJfPILOTHq@bombadil.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZQuPNzgJfPILOTHq@bombadil.infradead.org>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 05:32:55PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:57:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 06:05:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show()
> > > should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the
> > > value to be returned to user space.
> > 
> > Any comments?
> 
> What tree were you taretting, looks sane to me.

I see that you was a person with last SoB in late patches in that area.
Whatever it went through in your case.

P.S. TBH I thought you have your own tree for things like this...

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko