Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 05:10:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 05:10:44 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com ([216.148.227.88]:60056 "EHLO rwcrmhc52.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 05:10:34 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Adam Keys To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: IDE Harddrive Performance Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 04:10:38 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: thomas@deselaers.de (Thomas Deselaers), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20011222101028.DCPB6450.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@there> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On December 22, 2001 02:56, Alan Cox wrote: > > # hdparm -t /dev/hda > > > > /dev/hda: > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 86.98 seconds =753.46 kB/sec > > Do you get sane numbers if you use 2.4.9 for the hdparm test ? Just tried 2.4.9 and 2.4.10, both with ext3 patches. Both had the same abysmal numbers (791.48 KB/sec for 2.4.9). Any other combinations I should try? -- akk~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/