Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 12:40:29 -0700
From:   Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, erdemaktas@google.com,
        Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>, chen.bo@intel.com,
        linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
        Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
        Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
        Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
        Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: gmem: Implement test cases for
 error_remove_page
Message-ID: <20230922194029.GA1206715@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <cover.1695327124.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <ZQynx5DyP56/HAxV@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZQynx5DyP56/HAxV@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:29:59PM -0700,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> > 
> > This patch series is to implement test cases for the KVM gmem error_remove_page
> > method.
> > - Update punch hole method to truncate pages
> > - Add a new ioctl KVM_GUEST_MEMORY_FAILURE to inject memory failure on
> >   offset of gmem
> 
> Doh.  Please try to communicate what you're working on.  I was just about to hit
> SEND on a series to fix the truncation bug, and to add a similar test.  I would
> have happily punted that in your direction, but I had no idea that you were aware
> of the bug[*], let alone working on a fix.  I could have explicitly stated that
> I was going to fix the bug, but I thought that it was implied that I needed to
> clean up my own mess.

Oops sorry.  Now I'm considering about machine check injection.
i.e. somehow trigger kvm_machine_check() and its own test cases.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>