Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S274875AbRLVL5E>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:57:04 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S286766AbRLVL44>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:56:56 -0500
Received: from smtp-server2.cfl.rr.com ([65.32.2.69]:45712 "EHLO
	smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S274875AbRLVL4p>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:56:45 -0500
Message-ID: <002701c18adf$b9f0f140$ac542341@cfl.rr.com>
From: "Mike Black" <mblack@csihq.com>
To: "lkml" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112211439390.7313-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:56:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

My thanks to for Marcelo's efforts...but....

Is there any way we can get Marcelo, Rik, and Andrea to work together on the
"stable" version now (a Linux tribunal)?

If Rik and Andrea just send their patches to Marcelo can we get agreement on
one release version?
It would seem that it's time to converge for the sake of bringing some
stability & simplicity to 2.4.x

There's been way too much discussion/questions on the list from people
wondering which one to use.
I understand Linus' reluctance to incorporate but it just seems like it's
time to converge these branches.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/