Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:32:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:32:36 -0500 Received: from mta1n.bluewin.ch ([195.186.1.210]:64242 "EHLO mta1n.bluewin.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:32:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3C2343B90005C3A1@mta1n.bluewin.ch> (added by postmaster@bluewin.ch) From: "Per Jessen" To: "Linux KernelList" Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:30:12 +0100 Reply-To: "Per Jessen" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 95 (4.0.1212) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Configure.help editorial policy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 15:33:52 -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote: > >Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > >> GiB is not a useful standard because NOBODY USES IT. When it's in >> common use, then consider applying it to the kernel, but please, >> not before then. > > >What better place to start "common use" then the kernel source. >Let's lead the way, not wait around to follow others. > And in fact, people are using it. Like I said earlier, I used to work in StorageTek R&D, and we started using it. In fact the hardware people started first, so the displays on our VSM arrays (Terabyte sized RAID arrays) would use the kB = 1000byte whereas our reports would use kB=1024byte. Big confusion. AFAIR, the decision made to go with the IEC standard was primarily because it was a standard. regards, Per Jessen, Zurich regards, Per Jessen, Zurich http://www.enidan.com - home of the J1 serial console. Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave ... I'm afraid I can't do that." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/