Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
Message-ID: <47bed3cb-f307-ec55-5c28-051687dab1ea@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:07:36 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] scsi: scsi_error: Introduce new error handle
 mechanism
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <louhongxiang@huawei.com>,
        <lixiaokeng@huawei.com>
References: <20230901094127.2010873-1-haowenchao2@huawei.com>
 <ZRGfc73BSW0yyUtI@infradead.org>
From:   Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZRGfc73BSW0yyUtI@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2023/9/25 22:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Before we add another new error handling mechanism we need to fix the
> old one first.  Hannes' work on not passing the scsi_cmnd to the various
> reset handlers hasn't made a lot of progress in the last five years and
> we'll need to urgently fix that first before adding even more
> complexity.
> 
I observed Hannes's patches posted about one year ago, it has not been
applied yet. I don't know if he is still working on it.

My patches do not depend much on that work, I think the conflict can be
solved fast between two changes.