Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757953AbXKLArU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:47:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756165AbXKLArM (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:47:12 -0500 Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:52939 "EHLO fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756134AbXKLArL (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:47:11 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,402,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="378727816" Subject: Re: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, LKML In-Reply-To: <337294.80877.qm@web32607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <337294.80877.qm@web32607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:45:57 +0800 Message-Id: <1194828357.20251.63.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.2 (2.9.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2089 Lines: 55 On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 04:36 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: "Zhang, Yanmin" > > To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl > > Cc: LKML > > Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 10:47:52 AM > > Subject: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1 > > > > Comparing with 2.6.23, iozone sequential write/rewrite (512M) has > > 50% > > > regression > > in kernel 2.6.24-rc1. 2.6.24-rc2 has the same regression. > > > > My machine has 8 processor cores and 8GB memory. > > > > By bisect, I located patch > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h= > > 04fbfdc14e5f48463820d6b9807daa5e9c92c51f. > > > > > > Another behavior: with kernel 2.6.23, if I run iozone for many > > times > > > after rebooting machine, > > the result looks stable. But with 2.6.24-rc1, the first run of > > iozone > > > got a very small result and > > following run has 4Xorig_result. > > > > What I reported is the regression of 2nd/3rd run, because first run > > has > > > bigger regression. > > > > I also tried to change > > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio,dirty_backgroud_ratio > > > and didn't get improvement. > could you tell us the exact iozone command you are using? iozone -i 0 -r 4k -s 512m > I would like to repeat it on my setup, because I definitely see the opposite behaviour in 2.6.24-rc1/rc2. The speed there is much better than in 2.6.22 and before (I skipped 2.6.23, because I was waiting for the per-bdi changes). I definitely do not see the difference between 1st and subsequent runs. But then, I do my tests with 5GB file sizes like: > > iozone3_283/src/current/iozone -t 5 -F /scratch/X1 /scratch/X2 /scratch/X3 /scratch/X4 /scratch/X5 -s 5000M -r 1024 -c -e -i 0 -i 1 My machine uses SATA (AHCI) disk. -yanmin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/