Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756333AbXKLJpw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:45:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757068AbXKLJpe (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:45:34 -0500 Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:57174 "EHLO viefep15-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756449AbXKLJpd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:45:33 -0500 Subject: Re: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Zhang, Yanmin" Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <1194833640.20251.80.camel@ymzhang> References: <1194601672.20251.60.camel@ymzhang> <1194602064.6289.157.camel@twins> <1194833640.20251.80.camel@ymzhang> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5Qp5c6IbYhgVi5Rs+bsN" Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:45:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1194860728.7179.6.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2037 Lines: 61 --=-5Qp5c6IbYhgVi5Rs+bsN Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 10:14 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > Subject: mm: speed up writeback ramp-up on clean systems > > I tested kernel 2.6.23, 2,6,24-rc2, 2.6.24-rc2_peter(2.6.24-rc2+this patc= h). >=20 > 1) Compare among first/second/following running > 2.6.23: second run of iozone will get about 28% improvement than first ru= n. > Following run is very stable like 2nd run. > 2.6.24-rc2: second run of iozone will get about 170% improvement than fir= st run. 3rd run > will get about 80% improvement than 2nd. Following run is very stable li= ke 3rd run. > 2.6.24-rc2_peter: second run of iozone will get about 14% improvement tha= n first run. Following > run is mostly stable like 2nd run. > So the new patch really improves the first run result. Comparing wiht 2.6= .24-rc2, 2.6.24-rc2_peter > has 330% improvement on the first run. >=20 > 2) Compare among different kernels(based on the stable highest result): > 2.6.24-rc2 has about 50% regression than 2.6.23. > 2.6.24-rc2_peter has the same result like 2.6.24-rc2. > > From this point of view, above patch has no improvement. :) Drad, still good test results though. Could you describe you system in detail, that is, you have 8GB of memory and 8 cpus (2*quad?). How many disks does it have and are those aggregated using md or dm? What filesystem do you use? --=-5Qp5c6IbYhgVi5Rs+bsN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHOCC4XA2jU0ANEf4RAiBIAJ4kTQx8Y9P1Zmdnyyjx4YI1dR0GigCfVJZ4 CLjeSv7ZdFnrpKMV3LmYYuU= =/jLp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5Qp5c6IbYhgVi5Rs+bsN-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/