Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758234AbXKLJye (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:54:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756777AbXKLJy0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:54:26 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:10293 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756407AbXKLJy0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:54:26 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,404,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="201529488" Subject: Re: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <1194860728.7179.6.camel@twins> References: <1194601672.20251.60.camel@ymzhang> <1194602064.6289.157.camel@twins> <1194833640.20251.80.camel@ymzhang> <1194860728.7179.6.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:51:52 +0800 Message-Id: <1194861112.20251.124.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.2 (2.9.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1860 Lines: 48 On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 10:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 10:14 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > > > Subject: mm: speed up writeback ramp-up on clean systems > > > > I tested kernel 2.6.23, 2,6,24-rc2, 2.6.24-rc2_peter(2.6.24-rc2+this patch). > > > > 1) Compare among first/second/following running > > 2.6.23: second run of iozone will get about 28% improvement than first run. > > Following run is very stable like 2nd run. > > 2.6.24-rc2: second run of iozone will get about 170% improvement than first run. 3rd run > > will get about 80% improvement than 2nd. Following run is very stable like 3rd run. > > 2.6.24-rc2_peter: second run of iozone will get about 14% improvement than first run. Following > > run is mostly stable like 2nd run. > > So the new patch really improves the first run result. Comparing wiht 2.6.24-rc2, 2.6.24-rc2_peter > > has 330% improvement on the first run. > > > > 2) Compare among different kernels(based on the stable highest result): > > 2.6.24-rc2 has about 50% regression than 2.6.23. > > 2.6.24-rc2_peter has the same result like 2.6.24-rc2. > > > > From this point of view, above patch has no improvement. :) > > Drad, still good test results though. > > Could you describe you system in detail, that is, you have 8GB of memory > and 8 cpus (2*quad?). Yes. > How many disks does it have 1 machine uses 1 AHCI SATA. Other machines use hardware raid0. > and are those > aggregated using md or dm? No. > What filesystem do you use? Ext3. I got the regression on my a couple of machines. Pls. try command #iozone -i 0 -r 4k -s 512m -yanmin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/