Subject: Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?
From: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
In-Reply-To: <200711101827.47874.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <473031FA.2060707@openvz.org>
	 <1194608640.9377.104.camel@perihelion>
	 <1194610607.5000.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <200711101827.47874.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:03:21 +0000
Message-Id: <1194876201.5656.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 629
Lines: 15

On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:27 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> We fail rather than sleep in the "dependency isn't ready" case.  Partially 
> because it's not happened before, but partially because we risk nasty loops.

If we fail since we have to in the "dependency isn't ready" case then
the warning seems quite useless. I'll send a patch in a seperate mail
to remove the warning.

-jang

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/