Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756296AbXKLPXb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:23:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752193AbXKLPXW (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:23:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37235 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751434AbXKLPXW (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:23:22 -0500 Subject: Re: Kernel panic at boot with ondemand governor as default (2.6.24-rc2) From: Thomas Renninger Reply-To: trenn@suse.de To: Eric Piel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Venkatesh Pallipadi , Dave Jones , cpufreq In-Reply-To: <47385D05.20705@lifl.fr> References: <4737539F.2070401@lifl.fr> <1194859012.4590.595.camel@queen.suse.de> <47385D05.20705@lifl.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: Novell/SUSE Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:23:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1194880989.5474.12.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2297 Lines: 54 On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 15:02 +0100, Eric Piel wrote: > 11/12/2007 10:16 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote/a écrit: > > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 20:10 +0100, Eric Piel wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've tried kernel 2.6.24-rc2 and I have a problem with the new option > >> for setting up the cpufreq ondemand governor as default: a kernel panic > >> happens early at boot time. If I boot first with performance governor > >> and later change to ondemand, everything is fine (as usual). > >> > >> This seems related to the delayed_workqueue. The kernel panic message > >> finishes by: > >> EIP: [] wq_per_cpu+0x0/0x10 SS:ESP 0068:c191be58 > >> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > >> > >> A picture of the whole message is available here: > >> http://pieleric.free.fr/unorder/1162-ondemand-panic.jpg > >> > >> My computer is a x86 using speedstep-ich, and you can find the full > >> .config leading to the panic attached. > >> > >> Does anyone has any idea was it going wrong? > > > > Does it work if you compile speedstep-ich as a module? > > If you load it, ondemand governor should still be set up automatically. > > If this works, could it be that the kernel does not like that > > queue_delayed_work_on is called that early? > > Yes, it works if I compile speedstep-ich as module. I've put the module > in initramfs and as soon it is loaded, the ondemand governor is selected > and works. > > However, do you think it's ok to prevent cpufreq drivers to be built-in > if ondemand governor is selected as default? > Another way would be to > reorganise the initialisation code so that workqueue is initialised > before the cpufreq framework is started, do you think it's possible? Making all this work with low-level drivers built in would be perfect of course... If nobody answers the next days, could you open a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org, so that this does not get lost, pls. Add myself and Venkatesh to CC... I try to have a look at it ASAP. If someone already finds out more, this would be great. Thanks, Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/