Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Message-ID: <93396a36-30fe-74d6-d812-a93dafa771cb@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 18:37:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86: refactor req_immediate_exit logic
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
References: <20230924124410.897646-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
 <20230924124410.897646-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230924124410.897646-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/24/23 14:44, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> +	if (vcpu->arch.req_immediate_exit)
>   		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> -		static_call(kvm_x86_request_immediate_exit)(vcpu);
> -	}

Is it enough for your use case to add a new tracepoint here, instead of 
adding req_immediate_exit to both entry and exit?

Paolo