To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:42:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnfjh43m.c8q.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi>
References: <fgtfqa$h9j$1@ger.gmane.org> <m1sl3b4t5k.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> <slrnfjgmit.l07.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071112152057.GJ9771@stusta.de> <20071112160254.GA31972@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071112165616.GM9771@stusta.de> <20071112171626.GA8838@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071112173416.GO9771@stusta.de>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1041
Lines: 17

On 2007-11-12, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> Either they are empty transition packages depending on the linux-* 
> packages or you are not using Debian stable but Debian oldstable (the 
> latter would be funny in the context of your complaints...).

Well, I'm using two years old 2.6.7 kernel, because the newer
ones have become utter and total crap. (See the link in the
previous post.) It will likely be my last Linux kernel ever,
that I will use until this system becomes simply too obsolete,
at which point, if not before, I'll switch to either FreeBSD 
(quite unlikely), or Windows (XP), unless an unlikely miracle
has happened and FOSS has improved instead of continuing its
rapid downfall, dragging all of good bits of *nix legacy down
with it, retaining the bad bits.

-- 
Tuomo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/