Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:56:25 +0000
From:   Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, kernel@quicinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Prakash Viswalingam <quic_prakashv@quicinc.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Avoid spurious freezer wakeups
Message-ID: <ZRNFeXZ4tRbT7ws6@google.com>
References: <20230908-avoid-spurious-freezer-wakeups-v4-0-6155aa3dafae@quicinc.com>
 <ZRMEHb3_0Ku1UuK_@google.com>
 <20230926200238.GB13828@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230926200238.GB13828@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:02:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 04:17:33PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> > 
> > This issue is hurting the performance of our stable 6.1 releases. Does
> > it make sense to backport these patches into stable branches once they
> > land in mainline? I would assume we want to fix the perf regression
> > there too?
> 
> Note that these patches are in tip/sched/core, slated for the next merge
> window.

We can wait, no problem. I just wanted to make sure we also patch stable
if needed. Elliot, would you be able to send a backport of your patches
to stable once they land in mainline on the next merge window?

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

--
Carlos Llamas